12 11 2011

Read case digest here.

Republic of the Philippines


G.R. No. L-28089            October 25, 1967

BARA LIDASAN, petitioner,

Suntay for petitioner.
Barrios and Fule for respondent.


The question initially presented to the Commission on Elections,1 is this: Is Republic Act 4790, which is entitled “An Act Creating the Municipality of Dianaton in the Province of Lanao del Sur”, but which includes barrios located in another province — Cotabato — to be spared from attack planted upon the constitutional mandate that “No bill which may be enacted into law shall embrace more than one subject which shall be expressed in the title of the bill”? Comelec’s answer is in the affirmative. Offshoot is the present original petition for certiorari and prohibition.

On June 18, 1966, the Chief Executive signed into law House Bill 1247, known as Republic Act 4790, now in dispute. The body of the statute, reproduced in haec verba, reads:

Sec. 1. Barrios Togaig, Madalum, Bayanga, Langkong, Sarakan, Kat-bo, Digakapan, Magabo, Tabangao, Tiongko, Colodan, Kabamakawan, Kapatagan, Bongabong, Aipang, Dagowan, Bakikis, Bungabung, Losain, Matimos and Magolatung, in the Municipalities of Butig and Balabagan, Province of Lanao del Sur, are separated from said municipalities and constituted into a distinct and independent municipality of the same province to be known as the Municipality of Dianaton, Province of Lanao del Sur. The seat of government of the municipality shall be in Togaig.

Sec. 2. The first mayor, vice-mayor and councilors of the new municipality shall be elected in the nineteen hundred sixty-seven general elections for local officials.

Sec. 3. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.

It came to light later that barrios Togaig and Madalum just mentioned are within the municipality of Buldon,Province of Cotabato, and that Bayanga, Langkong, Sarakan, Kat-bo, Digakapan, Magabo, Tabangao, Tiongko, Colodan and Kabamakawan are parts and parcel of another municipality, the municipality of Parang, also in theProvince of Cotabato and not of Lanao del Sur.


About these ads



2 responses

12 11 2011
Lidasan vs COMELEC |

[…] Read full text here. nuffnang_bid = "ae5b4752a881366abcb1ed17b359ab76"; document.write('' ); Related PostsInsular Lumber vs Court of Tax AppealsFelicisima De La Cruz vs ParasTio vs Videogram Regulatory Board Tagged with: case brief • case digest • constitutional law • Effect if Title Does Not Completely Express the Subject • G.R. No. L-28089 • Jurisprudence • Lidasan vs COMELEC • Lidasan vs Commission on Elections • political law  Share this digest to your classmates! […]

25 06 2012
Stat Con 1st HW « Everything 1D

[…] V. Comelec, 21 SCRA 496 Full Text: Case Digest: […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 139 other followers

%d bloggers like this: