Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila Read the rest of this entry »
BAUTISTA vs CA
18 03 2012Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Bautista vs ca, Bautista vs Philippine Ready-Mixed Concrete Co. Inc, bautista vs prmcci, case brief, case digest, civil code, civil law, Domingo Bautista vs Court of Appeals, Extinguished Obligation Via Payment Cannot Be Revived, extinguishment of obligations, G.R. No. L-22710, how obligations are extinguished, Jurisprudence, obligations and contract, payment
Categories : Civil Law, Jurisprudence, Obligations and Contracts, SCRA
EQUITABLE BANK vs IAC
4 03 2012Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: 161 SCRA 518, article 1377 of the civil code, case brief, case digest, Certainty of Payee, civil code, civil law, equitable bank vs iac, equitable bank vs nell company, Equitable Banking Corporation vs Intermediate Appellate Court, equitable vs iac, G.R. No. 74451, Jurisprudence, mercantile law, Negotiable Instruments in General, negotiable instruments law, obligations and contract, section 8 of the negotiable instruements law
Categories : Civil Law, Jurisprudence, Mercantile Law, Negotiable Instruments Law, Obligations and Contracts, SCRA
BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY, INC vs COURT OF APPEALS
17 07 2011Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: 64 SCRA 427, BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY, BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY vs CA, BLTB vs CA, case brief, case digest, civil law, Civil Liability from Quasi Delicts vs Civil Liability from Crimes, civil procedure, criminal procedure, G.R. No. L-33138, G.R. No. L-33139, G.R. Nos. L-33138-39, Jurisprudence, obligations and contracts, remedial law, sources of obligations, Torts and Damages
Categories : Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Obligations and Contracts, Remedial Law, SCRA, Torts and Damages
Elcano vs Hill
17 07 2011Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: 77 SCRA 100, Article 2180, case brief, case digest, civil code, civil law, Civil Liability from Quasi Delicts vs Civil Liability from Crimes, civil procedure, criminal procedure, Effect of Acquittal, Elcano vs Hill, G.R. No. L-24803, independent civil action, Jurisprudence, obligations and contract, remedial law, separate civil action, sources of obligations, Torts and Damages
Categories : Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Obligations and Contracts, Remedial Law, SCRA, Torts and Damages
American Airlines vs Court of Appeals
6 11 2010
327 scra 482
Contract of Carriage
Private respondent Amadeo Seno purchased from Singapore Airlines in Manila conjunction tickets. In Geneva, the petitioner decided to forego his trip to Copenhagen, and go straight to New York, private respondent exchanged the unused portion of the conjunction ticket from International Air Transport Association clearing house in Geneva. Private respondent filed an action for damages before the RTC of Cebu for the alleged embarrassment and mental anguish he suffered at the Geneva Airport when the petitioner’s security officers prevented him from boarding the plane, detained him for about an hour and allowed him to board the plane only after all the passengers have boarded.
ISSUE: Whether or not the Philippine courts have jurisdiction over the action for damages.
HELD: The Supreme Court ruled that the case was properly filed in the Philippines. It held that the petitioner acted as an agent of the Singapore Airlines under IATA rules and as an agent of the principal carrier the petitioner may be held liable under contract of carriage in Manila.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: case brief, case digest, civil law, contract of carriage, contracts, Jurisprudence, scra
Categories : Civil Law, Human Relations, Jurisprudence, Obligations and Contracts, Preliminary Title
