Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Baguio City Read the rest of this entry »
MARCELINO vs CRUZ
26 10 2011Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: case brief, case digest, constitutional law, criminal procedure, G.R. No. L-42428, Jurisprudence, Marcelino vs Cruz, Period to Resolve a Case from Date of Submission, speedy trial
Categories : Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Political Law, Remedial Law, SCRA
TEVES vs VAMENTA
20 09 2011Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: case brief, case digest, crim pro, criminal procedure, G.R. No. L-38308, Jurisprudence, remedial law, Teves vs Vamenta
Categories : Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Remedial Law, SCRA
CANDIDA VIRATA vs VICTORIO OCHOA
23 07 2011Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: 81 scra 472, CANDIDA VIRATA vs VICTORIO OCHOA, case brief, case digest, civil law, civil liability, civil procedure, criminal procedure, double recovery, G.R. No. L-46179, Jurisprudence, remedial law, Torts and Damages, virata vs ochoa
Categories : Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Remedial Law, SCRA, Torts and Damages
BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY, INC vs COURT OF APPEALS
17 07 2011Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: 64 SCRA 427, BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY, BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY vs CA, BLTB vs CA, case brief, case digest, civil law, Civil Liability from Quasi Delicts vs Civil Liability from Crimes, civil procedure, criminal procedure, G.R. No. L-33138, G.R. No. L-33139, G.R. Nos. L-33138-39, Jurisprudence, obligations and contracts, remedial law, sources of obligations, Torts and Damages
Categories : Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Obligations and Contracts, Remedial Law, SCRA, Torts and Damages
Elcano vs Hill
17 07 2011Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: 77 SCRA 100, Article 2180, case brief, case digest, civil code, civil law, Civil Liability from Quasi Delicts vs Civil Liability from Crimes, civil procedure, criminal procedure, Effect of Acquittal, Elcano vs Hill, G.R. No. L-24803, independent civil action, Jurisprudence, obligations and contract, remedial law, separate civil action, sources of obligations, Torts and Damages
Categories : Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Obligations and Contracts, Remedial Law, SCRA, Torts and Damages
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK vs DALMACIO CATIPON
17 07 2011Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: 98 Phil 27, civil law, civil procedure, criminal procedure, Effect of Acquittal, G.R. No. L-6662, Jurisprudence, PNB vs Catipon, remedial law, Torts and Damages
Categories : Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Remedial Law, SCRA, Torts and Damages
LUCIO FRANCISCO vs ONRUBIA
2 07 2011Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: 46 Phil 327, case brief, case digest, Francisco vs Onrubia, G.R. No. 22063, Jurisprudence, Torts and Damages, When Liability for Quasi Delict Arises
Categories : Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Remedial Law, SCRA, Torts and Damages
Datu Pax Pakung Mangudadatu vs HRET & Angelo Montilla
25 11 2010
Due Process – Administrative Bodies – HRET – Service of Summons
Datu Pax and Montilla were rivals in the Congressional elections in 2007. Datu Pax won the elections. Montilla contested the results of the elections before the HRET. The Secretary of HRET the issued the summons to Datu Pax to his quite remote residence in Sultan Kudarat. Datu Pax was required to file a reply within ten days from receipt.
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: administrative bodies, case brief, case digest, consti, constitutional law, Datu Pax Pakung Mangudadatu vs HRET & Angelo Montilla, due process, G.R. No. 179813, HRET, mangudadatu, mangudadatu vs house tribunal, mangudadatu vs hret, political law, scra, service of summons
Categories : Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Political Law, Remedial Law
Horacio Morales Jr vs Minister of Defense Juan Ponce Enrile et al
17 11 2010
Habeas Corpus – The Right to Bail
In April 1982, Morales and some others were arrested while driving a motor vehicle in Laong-Laan St, QC. They were charged in CFI Rizal for rebellion punishable under the RPC. Morales alleged that they were arrested without any warrant of arrest; that their constitutional rights were violated, among them the right to counsel, the right to remain silent, the right to a speedy and public trial, and the right to bail.
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: case brief, case digest, consti, constitutional law, G.R. No. L-61016, habeas corpus, Jurisprudence, morales vs enrile, political law, scra, The Right to Bail, writ of habeas corpus
Categories : Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Political Law, Remedial Law
Frank Uy & Unifish Packing Corp. vs Bureau of Internal Revenue et al
15 11 2010
Search and Seizure – Requisites of a Valid Search Warrant
In Sept 1993, Rodrigo Abos, a former employee of UPC reported to the BIR that Uy Chin Ho aka Frank Uy, manager of UPC, was selling thousands of cartons of canned cartons without issuing a report. This is a violation of Sec 253 & 263 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Comments : 2 Comments »
Tags: case brief, case digest, G.R. No. 129651, Jurisprudence, Requisites of a Valid Search Warrant, scra, Search and Seizure, Search Warrant, uy vs bir, Valid Search Warrant
Categories : Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure, Jurisprudence, Political Law, Remedial Law
