BRILLANTES vs YORAC

26 10 2011

Read case digest here.

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Baguio City Read the rest of this entry »





ROGELIO Z. BAGABUYO vs COMELEC

23 06 2011

Read case digests here: PlebisciteReapportionment 

Republic of the Philippines

SUPREME COURT

Manila Read the rest of this entry »





BAI SANDRA S. A. SEMA vs COMELEC

23 06 2011

Read digest here.

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila Read the rest of this entry »





Amelito Mutuc vs. COMELEC

6 11 2010


Ejusdem Generis

Mutuc was a candidate for delegate to the Constitutional Convention (1970). His candidacy was given due course by the COMELEC but he was prohibited from playing his campaign jingle on his mobile units because this is an apparent violation  of COMELEC’s band “to purchase, produce, request or distribute sample ballots, or electoral propaganda gadgets such as pens, lighters, fans (of whatever nature), flashlights, athletic goods or materials, wallets, bandanas, shirts, hats, matches, cigarettes, and the like, whether of domestic or foreign origin.”  It was COMELEC’s contention that the jingle proposed to be used by petitioner is the recorded or taped voice of a singer and therefore a tangible propaganda material (falling under and the like’s category), under the above COMELEC statute subject to confiscation.

READ THE REST OF THE DIGEST HERE








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 106 other followers

%d bloggers like this: